Thursday, 28 January 2016

Weekly assessment questions

Yo,

Two Psychologists were interested in obedience in a public setting. They had a person dressed as a train station manager standing in Newcastle train station. Whenever people were running for a train he would tell them to stop so he could ask them questions and search their bags. Explain one reason why people would be likely to obey in this situation (3)

Young people are getting a ‘bad press’ coverage for hanging around towns in groups and wearing ‘hoodies’. Using social identity theory explain one reason why teenagers might be getting negative media coverage. (3)

Explain with reference to theory one explanation of dementia (3)

Explain how you could have prevented one weakness of your cognitive practical (3)

James is addicted to a recreational drug. Explain one biological reason why he might be addicted drugs (3)

KOP!

Monday, 25 January 2016

Sample exam questions - 12 marks

Yo,

Here are some sample 12 mark questions you might be likely to be asked...

Compare Lab experiments to Questionnaires (12)
Compare Lab experiments to Interviews (12)
Compare Field experiments to Questionnaires (12)
Compare Field experiments to Interviews (12)

Compare Lab experiments to Questionnaires in terms of validity (12)
Compare Lab experiments to Interviews in terms of validity (12)
Compare Field experiments to Questionnaires in terms of validity (12)
Compare Field experiments to Interviews in terms of validity (12)

Compare a classic study in Social Psychology to a classic study in Cognitive Psychology (12)

Compare a contemporary study in Social Psychology to a contemporary study in Cognitive Psychology (12)

Any that you want marked, bring to me.

KOP!

Thursday, 21 January 2016

Classic biological psychology - Raine et al. (1997)

Yo,

Here's a summary:

Aims: To show that the brains of murderers who pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity were different from the brains of non-murderers. Raine et al. Investigated whether brain dysfunction predisposed people to violent behaviour.


Background Literature: Previous studies linked certain parts of the brain to violent behaviour-

Ø  EEGs, neurological and cognitive testing suggest that there is a link between brain dysfunction and violent behaviour. The prefrontal cortex and different functioning of the two hemispheres are thought to be important.
Ø  Recent mapping techniques have found reduced electrical activity in the left angular gyrus in violent offenders
Ø  Some experimental animal research suggests that the limbic structures (amygdala and hippocampus) and the thalamus are involved in aggression.

Raine listed these regions and studied them both in murderers pleading not guilty by reason of insanity and in a control group. A preliminary study of 22 murderers and 22 ‘normal’ participants gave some support for prefrontal dysfunction in the murderers.


Procedure: There were 41 murderers pleading not guilty by reason of insanity and 41 controls.

There were 39 men and 2 women who had been charged with either murder or manslaughter. Average age was 34.3. All had been referred to the university of California Irvine Imaging Center to obtain evidence relating to a ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ defence or to gather evidence for some other part of their trials to do with incompetence.

 The group consisted of 23 people with a history of brain damage, 6 schizophrenics, 3 people with a history of substance abuse, 2 had an affective disorder, 2 had epilepsy, 3 were diagnosed as hyperactive or with a learning disability and 2 had paranoid personality disorder. None were on medication.

The control group was formed by matching each murderer with a normal participant of the same sex and age, and who was similar in other ways, e.g. There were 6 schizophrenics. None of the control group was on medication. The group consisted of 39 males and 2 females (average age 31.7).


PET scanning procedure: The procedure of the study was as follows..

Ø Each participant carried out a practice test

Ø 10 minutes later, a fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) trace was injected

Ø The participant then completed a continuous performance task and target recognition was recorded

Ø After a 32 minute period of FDG uptake, the participant was taken for a PET scan of the head and images of slices of the brain were produced

Brain regions were identified by:

Ø The cortical peel technique- slices were examined and glucose values for each region of interest were compared with those of other areas in a slice

Ø A box technique- 2cm2 boxes of brain area were examined and linked scan results to the suggested areas for violence


Results: In the tasks carried out before the PET scan there were no differences in performance between the two groups.

Cortical Regions
Sub-cortical Regions
Prefrontal lobe- the murderers had lower glucose metabolism in comparison with controls in some areas
Corpus callosum- murderers had lower glucose metabolism than the control group
Parietal lobe- the murderers had lower glucose metabolism than the controls, particularly in the left angular gyrus and bilateral superior parietal regions
Amygdala- murderers had reduced activity in the left amygdala and greater activity in the right amygdala than the controls
Temporal lobe- no significant differences between the groups
Medial temporal lobe (including hippocampus)- murderers had reduced left activity and greater right activity than controls
Occipital lobe- Murderers had higher glucose metabolism than controls
Thalamus- murderers had greater right thalamic activity than controls


Raine et al. (1997) also looked at other variables where the groups differed that may have affected results. They checked right/left handedness and found that this would not have affected results. They checked ethnicity and found no significant differences. They checked for head injury, 23 murderers had history of head injury, this seemed to lower activity in the corpus callosum.


Conclusions: It was concluded that murderers pleading not guilty by reason of insanity have-

Ø Reduced glucose metabolism in the bilateral prefrontal cortex, the posterior parietal cortex and the corpus callosum

Ø Abnormal activity in the amygdala, thalamus and medial temporal gyrus, including the hippocampus
 

These findings support the idea that violence has biological causes.

Ø Prefrontal deficits can result in impulsivity and loss of self-control, as well as emotionality and an inability to modify behaviour

Ø Limbic deficits show the amygdala is associated with aggressive behaviour, both in animals and humans. The amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex govern the expression of emotion and the thalamus relays information. The hippocampus is thought to modulate aggression (in cats) and there is other evidence linking the limbic system to aggression, emotion and control

Ø The posterior parietal cortex seems to be linked to cognitive functioning. For example, reductions in glucose metabolism in the left angular gyrus have been correlated with reduced verbal activity. Cognitive dysfunction could mean educational and occupational failure, which may lead to crime and violence

Ø A dysfunction in the corpus callosum may explain hemisphere differences because the corpus callosum links the two hemispheres. The right hemisphere has been said to generate negative effects in humans and may be in the murderers less regulated by the right hemisphere. Studies of rats reinforce this idea.

 
Findings show that neural processes underlying violence are complex and that there is no single mechanism in the brain that causes violence. ‘Violent behaviour probably involves disruption of a network of multiple interacting brain mechanisms that predispose violence in the presence of other social, environmental and psychological predispositions’.

Overall, murderers pleading guilty by reason of insanity seem to have different brain functioning from controls.

KOP!

Monday, 18 January 2016

Brain scans!

Yo,

Happy new yizzle psychologizzlists!

Here are the brain scan slides:








KOP!

Friday, 4 December 2015

Schmolck et al (2002) - AO1 summary info

Yo,

Here is a good summary for the AO1 part of Schmolck's study:


Schmolck (2002)

Aim

To look at the relationship between performance on semantic memory tasks and the extent of temporal lobe damage to find out to what extent is it involved in semantic memory

Specifically to look at HM’s performance to see what was different from the performance of the other patients with brain damage

Procedure:
 
Participants

Six patients with amnesia were compared to eight ‘normal’ participants

3 patients had encephalitis leading to their amnesia (EP, GP, GT) who had large medial temporal lobe damage and varying damage to their anterolateral temporal cortex (MTL+)

HM- who had lateral MTL damage

2 patients with amnesia caused by damage in their hippocampal formation (HF)

They gave semantic knowledge tests to patients who had damage to the MTL and to the ALTC (they varied in damage, measured by an MRI scan or fMRI scan).

They also used patients with damage to the hippocampal formation (which is within the MTL)…so they looked at those who had whole MTL damage and those who just had damage to one part.
Testing procedure:

They conducted 9 tests over 5 different sessions

Seven were from the semantic test battery and two constructed by the researcher


48 items were used – 24 objects and 24 animals. These were further categorised into categories: domestic land animals, foreign land animals, water animals, birds, electrical household items, non-household electrical items, vehicles, and musical instruments (these are the ‘objects’ or ‘drawings’ etc in the tests)
 
Results

Tasks 1-9:

       Those with Hippocampus damage (HF) were able to name, point out, and answer questions about objects they were given with considerable accuracy. (Similarly to the control group)

       Those with MTL+ performed less well. They also had difficulty thinking of examples from a category e.g. dog breeds

 

       HM did the worst (in MTL group)

       The MTL+ found it most difficult to identify and recall facts about living objects compared to non-living objects in all tasks.

Tasks 10-13

-MTL+ performed well (but one made 8 errors)

-All MTL+ scored well on the colouring task

MTL+ & HM scored below 90% on the palm tree task

MTL+ produced regular plurals and verbs but performed less well at producing irregular verbs and plurals. HM was fine in both

 

Conclusions

The MTL+ patient data shows that damage to the anterolateral temporal cortex is consistent with loss of semantic knowledge that results in ‘blurring’ or overlap of conceptual knowledge that leads to confusion.

Semantic knowledge is associated with the anterolateral region and not the medial temporal lobe.

 
 
 
KOP!